Skip to content

chore: document testing flow#99

Open
dmcilvaney wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom
dmcilvaney:damcilva/chore_document_testing
Open

chore: document testing flow#99
dmcilvaney wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom
dmcilvaney:damcilva/chore_document_testing

Conversation

@dmcilvaney
Copy link

Was trying to run the unit tests while experimenting with something, and it was a bit of a trial-and-error type of thing.

I think I captured the steps I went through and added them to the readme, along with creating a requirements file for development dependencies.

The tests should also show up properly in VSCode now.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.08%. Comparing base (8077ac1) to head (e2c8a28).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #99      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.35%   84.08%   -1.27%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines         867      867              
==========================================
- Hits          740      729      -11     
- Misses        127      138      +11     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 63.66% <ø> (ø)
slow-other ?
unit 75.20% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dmcilvaney dmcilvaney force-pushed the damcilva/chore_document_testing branch from 102dd6a to e2c8a28 Compare January 13, 2026 02:40
@dmcilvaney dmcilvaney marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants