extract additional methods in SecurityHandler to reduce checks number#424
Open
valerybokov wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
Open
extract additional methods in SecurityHandler to reduce checks number#424valerybokov wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
valerybokov wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've extracted several methods because the decryptDictionary(COSDictionary, long, long) method has type checks (old code, line 616), and the decrypt(COSBase, long, long) method has the same type checks. So, there is double type check in the code. The new implementation of the decryptDictionary method calls overloads of the decrypt method for each type (COSString, COSArray, COSDictionary) to avoid double type check.
Perhaps all of these new methods should be made public (or all of them private). You're the one in charge.